-
The primary goal of health regulation should be to advance
and protect the best interests and health freedoms of
consumers.
-
Regulation should seek not to unnecessarily limit consumer
choice but rather to ensure safety through appropriate
good manufacturing practices and clear labelling laws.
Product efficacy should only be a secondary goal no more
restrictive than for other industries.
-
Regulation should only be used where it can be tangibly
shown to further the good of consumers
-
New Zealand should
set its own standards and control its own industries. It
must not cede control
-
Regulation should be appropriate to
each industry based on the actual risk profiles of that
industry. Natural health should be regulated through a
stand alone regulator, not as a division of a larger pharmaceutical
or food regulator.
-
For regulatory purposes evidence should
be defined to include empirical evidence, effects and results,
traditional use and good science.
-
Traditional and cultural
products, remedies and treatments should be preserved
and access to them protected
-
It should be illegal to suppress
any product, treatment or device which can be shown to
be safe and have positive results.
-
Natural Health Products
should be maintained as a health option for consumers and
protected from commercial attacks from competing industries.
-
The right to make claims for products, treatments and
devices should be protected on the basis that evidence
is held.
-
The right to advertise and educate the public about
health products and services and medical devices in an
appropriate way should be protected.
-
Innovation must be encouraged
and the regulatory system should be sure to accommodate
innovation in a financially feasible way.
-
Health professionals should
be obliged to advise patients of all health choices including
natural alternatives
-
Regulation should be designed so as
to enable low volume products and devices to still be marketed
in a financially viable way.
-
Naturally occurring ingredients
should only be controlled by way of prohibited or controlled
lists (black list approach - innocent until proven guilty)
and not by a pre approved ingredient list (white list
approach - guilty until proven innocent)
-
There should not be maximum levels
of naturally occurring ingredients unless there is clear
evidence of significant risk to a wide section of society
without such limits.
-
Penalties should be appropriate to
the offence and relative to all other non health industries.
-
Every
penalty imposed should be subject to review by a genuinely
independent authority and in a manner affordable to small
and medium sized enterprises.